310_Ind2_S3

Name: Nathalie Lopez

Instructions: You are to interview two people and record their responses on this form. You should state their name and their comments to your solution to the identified problem.

VI. I interviewed two individuals to see what their response would be to my (our) plan. Their responses are as follows.

Curtis Thorngood- He believed that our solution to the plan was good and effective. However, he thought that the use of the breathalyzer should be mandated after the first offense because if they have a drinking problem once, it is likely for the problem to happen again. Also, after the second offense, the license should be suspended for one year.

Mark Adams- He feels that first time offenders that blow between .08-.10 should attend alcohol awareness programs and pay a fine. If they blow between .10-.14, they should spend a week in jail. Anything above .15, then they should spend 60 days in jail. He feels people make mistakes and take a couple drinks at dinner. They shouldn't be punished so harshly if they are barely at the limit. Once it goes beyond, then you should throw the book at them.

VII. My (our) answer, based on our research, to their objections and concerns are

I agree with Mark and we should make limits to their punishments. Depending on what they blow should also depend on their punishments. However, after their first offense then they should spend 6 months in jail and attend AA meetings. I also agree with Curtis and we should suspend driver's licenses that have been pulled over more than once for a DUI. They shouldn't have the privelege of attaining a license if they are out there risking their life as well as other innocent lives.

Adams, Mark. Personal interview. 21 Feb. 2011. I intervied Mark Adams to get an idea of what he thought of our solution to the problems.

Thorngood, Curtis. Personal interview. 21 Feb. 2011. I intervied Curtis Thorngood to get a response to our solution.